Филологические науки/7.Язык, речь, речевая коммуникация
Bulatova
M.B.
Kostanay
State University named after A. Baitursynov, Kazakhstan
Obscene and slang vocabulary in the Internet discourse.
All deviant
behavior in a virtual environment can be divided into two types: those that
came to us from the real communication - verbal aggression means, transformed
into the text, and the types of interpersonal aggression, primarily, being
characteristic for Internet discourse generated because of the functioning of this discourse. The
rapid development of the Internet contributes to the fact that almost every
year new words and phrases related to slang and jargon appear, their own unique
languages are invented ,already invented ones are developing, so
the study of this issue must be extensive and continuous.
The most obvious way of using aggression is the
invective lexicon [1, 2]. There
are 8 of invective vocabulary with the characteristics of virtual communication:
Words and
expressions from the beginning indicating antisocial, denounced social
activity: «хацкер», «тролль», «флудер».
Words of negative
connotation, meaning the main component of their use: «сдохнуть», «аффтар».
Names of computer parts that are used in a
figurative sense «винт», «девайс», «матка»
Zoosemantic
metaphors that refer to the names of animals: «грызун», «осёл».
Verbs with
"condemning" semantics or even direct negative evaluation: «оффтопить», «хакнуть».
Words containing
in its negative value, and very expressive evaluate anybody's personality:
«нуб», «задрот»
Occasional (specially created)
punning education designed to humiliate or insult the addressee: «пэтэушнег», «сотона».
According to research site www.voxkz.kz, obscene
language is very common among users of Kaznet: 64% of respondents admitted that
most of their friends use in his speech nonnormative expressions. Only 34% of respondents said that most of
their friends do not use such an expression. Speaking for themself personally,
85% of survey participants also don’t hide that they use profanity, including
65% say that this rarely happens, and 20% - which is often. Only 14% of
respondents do not use such expressions [3].
In addition to the active use of invective lexicon,
discount expressions, colloquialisms and slang elements to the specific
characteristics of verbal behavior of this linguistic community may be assigned
so-called ORFO art - spelling invented by the creator of the site and a pioneer
of Newspeak Dmitry Sokolovsky, known under the pseudonym web «Удав» [5] . His invention is not simple styling
writing of an illiterate schoolboy, but reflects the common desire of Kaznet
users to extended and intense metalinguistic reflection and is a means of
creating a model of linguistic identity «падонка», «птушнега», «быдла»,
understood as a category of users aesthetic and not social.
Here are some of
the most common deviations from the linguistic norm adopted by www.udaff.com:
Letter «Ы» after
the sizzling and «Ц»: «будоражыть», «жыд», «жызненый», «шышки», «пишыт»,
«фашыст», «огетацыя», «працытировать», «Тицыан», «правакацыя», «письма в
редакцыю».
«Чу/щу» – with «ю»
(«чювак»);
Ча/ща – with «я»
(«умейте атличять хуйню от хуйни»)
Чк/–чн – with
«мягким знаком» («абычьно»)
Unvoicement of
voiced consonants in a weak position («чуфства», «фсе», «рас», «фкусно жрать»,
«раскас», «аффтар», «всгляд», «праф», «напесаф», «фтыкать», «викенх», «многа
букф»);
Voicing of
voiceless consonants in the end of a word: («превед», «мудаг», «теоретег»,
«итаг», «тод»);
Transcribing
letters for two sounds : («йазык», «йа проста размистил абйаву», «выпей йаду»,
«йайца», «такойе мойе мненийе»)
Systematic
violation of the rules of writing vowels in unstressed prefixes and roots of
words : («стехи», «аслы», «гастевуха», «неутамимый», «харашо напесал», «тибе»,
«свае», «скарей», «сиводня», «саплей зиленой», «еще адин любитиль миксиканских
сириалов выискалсо» «пайми наканец», «миравой ризананз»; «падонки», «мелетарист»,
«калонка», «камитет», «пагаловна», «пашол», «пра танки–ракеты будем пиздеть?»,
«ашиблись рубрекой?», «мелкий пакастник»);
Errors in
alternate roots: («предлажение»);
Suffixes -ик/-чик with derivational
diminutive are replaced by –чег : («котег», «зайчег», «йожег», «красавчег», «лифчег», «мерзавчег»);
The suffix -ник is replaced by –нег :
(«мобильнег», «монтажнег», «птушнег», «кубег-рубег»);
Writing –ц/ца instead of
–тся in verbs of third person of present simple time :
(«нравицца», «остальные пруцца», «а мне парой хочецца получить в морду»);
Writing –ц/цо in the infinitive : («на это
обижаццо?»);
Postfix –ся is replaced by –со («панравелсо», «купилсо»,
«ашибсо»);
Fused writing of
prepositions («встаронку», «паходу», «фтему», «фтопку», «невсосал»,
«ниасилил»).
Thus, ORFO art affects Russian spelling rules that are
studied at school, so many of them have become almost common nouns and it
parodies phonetic, phonemic and morphological principles of Russian spelling.
Sometimes lexeme
itself, modified by these rules, takes
new meaning desirable for authors and visitors. Thus, transcription of
"ю" and complete unvoicement of
final consonant in the last word of the phrase " фсе птицы летят на
йух " quite in keeping with the language of reflection network of"
падонков". Characteristically, integral part of the Russian-speaking voice
of the counterculture Internet sector - slang and obscene vocabulary is exposed
to the distortion. («батанег», «пелотка», «галимый», «жлопь», «скатина»,
«казлы», «гавно» и т.п.) [4].
At the moment, the "язык падонкав" has become an integral part of a
virtual lexicon. And the use of obscene invective lexicon in the virtual
community is due to several reasons, among them: increased emotional speech
discharge psychological stress, insult, humiliation addressee speech,
demonstration of aggression, lack of fear, indifference to anything or
demonstration of belonging to a particular group, community.
Literature
1. Войскунский
А. Е. Развитие речевого общения как результат применения Интернета. – 2001. –
Интернет-публикация:http://www.psynet.by.ru/index.html.
2. Жельвис
В.И. Поле брани. Сквернословие как социальная проблема. / В.И. Жельвис. - М.:
Ладомир, 2001. – 350 с.
3. Служба
онлайн-опросов // http://voxru.net/
4. Чернышев
А.В. Современная советская мифология. / А.В. Чернышев - Тверь, 1992. - 80 с.
5. Шаповалова
Н.Г. ОРФО-арт: карнавальное общение в виртуальной реальности /
Н.Г. Шаповалова //http://www.kti.ru/forum/img/usersf/pic_663.doc