Tatarinova L.F.
Ph.D., assistant professor of "Jurisprudence and
International Law" "Turan" University
Tatarinov D.V.
PhD, Department of International Law
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Conceptual problems of labeling information harmful to the Information
and Communication Networks
Abstract This article
analyzes the current draft law «On the protection of children from information
harmful to their health and development». The authors analyze the gaps and made
recommendations to address them.
Keywords: information, global
network, the Internet, marking, protection from harmful information, the law.
Development
of computer technology and network resources, increase of the diversity of
available products, as well as improving access to the global Internet, the
availability of network resources for children and adolescents placed for
modern society and legislators a new problem: the problem of labeling
information.
Given
that, at the present time educational institutions focus on students getting
information from the global information and communication networks, the problem
of protection of children from harmful information or information inflicting
psychological trauma remains relevant.
Moreover,
it is worth noting that under the "information causing psychological
trauma" we mean information that is not designated to a particular child's
age, that is, information allowed for review by persons under 16 years old, can
cause psychological trauma (including due to the immature psyche or absence certain
knowledge) to persons from 5 to 12 years.
In
addition, given that the information does not have any structure, content,
logical connection, we can assume that it has a high chance to soak into the
consciousness of the child in such a haphazard way, which can lead to a variety
of negative consequences, ranging from behavioral problems and ending suicide.
This
view is supported by both domestic and foreign researchers, highlighting
Internet addiction in the group of non-chemical dependency as a special
manifestation of deviant behavior [1, p.3].
Generalization
and systematization of presented in psychological and pedagogical literature
trends which accompany the introduction of Internet technology education,
showed that "... along with positive trends: Information (increasing
accessibility of various educational arrays); efficiency (fast transmission and
receipt of information); expansion of means of communication (communication via
electronic text, Skype and so on.); ergonomics (to save time and material resources
for educational services, educational information) et al., with the
modernization of education there are negative trends: zombification (imposing
ideals and way of thinking); manipulation of consciousness (the conversion of
users from stakeholders in the manipulation of objects, due to the destructive
impact on the minds of users); virtualization of consciousness (or ignoring
virtualization liability); primitivization (simplification of linguistic forms,
methods of expression, communication, access to ready-made educational products
of low quality); vulgarization (admissibility of abuse and foul language in all
types of Internet products, popularization of porn, poems and songs with
overtones); randomization (Network building on the principle of universal
chaos); implementation of various provocations (distribution sites provocative
information); expansion of the range-dependent on-line games - (penetration of
the game on the Internet); criminalization (demonstration on the web clips
criminal content with their subsequent approving discussion forums);
commercialization ("pumping" money from Internet users);
resocialization (substitution of real life in human society virtual existence
on the Internet, which leads to social exclusion and artificial "autization"
card) and so on."[2].
Currently,
in the Republic of Kazakhstan the protection of children from information that
is not appropriate to their age, have no legal regulation that generates
turnover of the most dangerous for children kinds of information products
around them.
Outside
the sphere of legislative regulation currently remains the information
distributed over mobile networks, via computer and electronic games, public,
entertainment. Not fixed by legislation requirements for the content of
printed, audiovisual and electronic products intended for children of different
age groups with regard to their psycho-physiological characteristics.
All
of the above trends are determinants of adolescent enthusiasm for the Internet
and, as a consequence, the manifestations of their propensity to Internet
addiction, which puts teachers and parents to have to provide assistance and
support to children, on the one hand, and fixing on the legislative level
mechanisms to protect children from information that can harm the mental health
of children, on the other
In
this regard, we note that the development of the draft law "On the
protection of children from information harmful to their health and
development" acquires particular relevance and validity.
Such
a bill would regulate social relations arising in connection with the
implementation of children's rights to receive and disseminate information
appropriate to their age and aims to protect children from information harmful
to health and / or development.
So,
the main problem questions that need to pay attention of experts and lawmakers
are problems associated with the lack of current legislation of joint
evaluation of information, which, in turn, can lead to significant
discrepancies in the marking of the same information materials by various
experts.
Thus,
the information that can be harmful to the psychological health of children,
has the ability to apply first for an arbitrary classification and label
warnings, and only then follows the procedure for establishing and / or
confirming its harmfulness first parents and teachers, then experts. This
process, taking into account the objective symptoms, takes considerable amount
of time.
And
only after all the process above, to suspend the turnover or total withdrawal
of such information decision is made. During this time, children are exposed to
harmful information, and absolutely no one is responsible for it.
Considering
the marking information, we note that in every age child has their
physiological features.
So,
kids, at least up to three years, not able to recognize the existing
differences between good and evil, respectively, the demonstration of violence,
even in the most harmless as they can harm the child's mind and affect the
health of children. Therefore, it is safe to assume that the information
products containing any images or descriptions of violence in any form, in the
age of "up to 6" may cause harm to health and (or) development of
children.
Or
focus attention on other age limit - 12 years.
This
age, due to certain physiological characteristics of puberty, has a number of
difficulties, so one or other malicious information can eliminate these
problems as well as aggravate.
For
example, information products containing "justifiable by genre and plot unnaturalistic
occasional picture or description of sexual intercourse between a man and a
woman not wearing the exciting or offensive or pornographic nature."
According
to experts, "... for twelve teenager any images or descriptions of sexual
relations between a man and a woman can not wear the exciting nature because of
physiological and psychological characteristics of this age. For children in
puberty and even occasional unnaturalistic image or description of sexual
intercourse between men and women will be wearing erotic nature with relevant
corrupting effects, that is, to cause obvious harm to their health and
development " [3].
With
regard to the concept of "information products" blurring the criteria
used to define "Types of information harmful to the health and development
of children", "defamatory"; "Provocative";
"Contains propaganda"; "Promotes"; "Calling",
etc. draws the attention.
If
we consider the information prohibited for distribution to children in a broad
sense, it can be attributed to:
1)
encourage children to commit acts which threaten their life and (or) health,
including to harm their health, suicide;
2)
the ability to arouse the desire of children: use of narcotic drugs,
psychotropic and (or) intoxicants, tobacco and alcohol products, beer and beverages
produced on its basis; participate in gambling, prostitution, vagrancy or
begging;
3)
the admissibility of substantiating or justifying violence and (or) or cruelty
motivating exercise violence against people or animals;
4)
denying family values and generates disrespect for parents and (or) other
family members;
5)
justifies unlawful behavior;
6)
contains foul language;
7)
containing information of a pornographic nature.
The
information, which spread among the children of a certain age group is limited,
includes information:
1)
is in the form of pictures or descriptions of violence, physical and (or)
mental violence, crime or other antisocial activities;
2)
cause children fear, terror or panic, including representation in the form of
pictures or descriptions in dehumanizing form of non-violent death, disease,
suicide, accident, disaster or catastrophe and (or) their consequences;
3)
is in the form of pictures or descriptions of sexual relations between a man
and a woman;
4)
containing swear words and expressions that are not related to foul language
[4].
No
less controversial is the introduction and acceptance criterion with regard to
information: "The ability to cause in children recurring fear, panic or
inspire them with horror."
In
our opinion, the provisions concerning the rules of evaluation and
classification of information products and the age group for which it is made
must be changed. It is necessary to reconsider the approach of the state to the
fact that the classification of information products is carried out not
specially authorized state bodies, and its manufacturers and / or distributors
of their own (including with experts, experts and / or expert organizations).
Consequently, there is no state guarantee of adequate quality information products.
In
this case, we have in mind, and activities related to the field of advertising.
This
is yet another gap in the law, as advertising (directly or indirectly) can
influence the subconscious of minors and create negative attitudes. It seems
appropriate to include in legislation provisions aimed at regulating the
evaluation of promotional products.
Thus,
it is advisable to make to the national legislation, namely the Criminal Code
of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the rules provide for criminal liability for
violation of the laws of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the protection of
children from information harmful to their health and (or) development.
Normally
should detail the grounds for applying to the offender of criminal liability;
established the responsibility of experts and expert organizations in the form
of a fine and deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in
certain activities for up to 5 years.
The
proposed changes aimed at protecting minors from negative information will
enable a new level of protection of human rights, particularly the rights of
children.
Coping
with providing information and psychological security of minors requires a
comprehensive approach, that is the question of improving the theory and
empirical laws: through the analysis of statistical data, jurisprudence, the
monitoring of public opinion, the study of international experience.
Given
the above, fully supporting the basic idea of the need to protect children from
information harmful to their health and development and sharing the view of the
need to limit the circulation of information products, depending on the age of
the children, we believe that the problem of determining the age criteria and
labeling needs to be addressed in conjunction with psychology and physiology.
List of references:
1.
Dmitriev K.G. Psychological determinants of Internet addiction in adolescence:
Author. dis. ... Psih.nauk. - M., 2013. - 21 p.
2.
Zavalishina O.V. Pedagogical support adolescents who are prone to Internet
addiction: Author. diss. ... Kand.ped.nauk. - Kursk, 2012. - 27 p.
3.
Dossier on the draft Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On protection of
children from information harmful to their health and development" // IS «Paragraph»
http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=31249501#sub_id=6
4.
Federal Law of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2010 ¹ 436-FZ "On
protection of children from information harmful to their health and
development."