IMPACT FRACTURE AND OF TILLAGE ON EFFICIENCY OF BARLEY
Baimbaev BJ
Kostanai State University im.A.Baytursynova,
Kostanai
One of the most important
reserves for the production of feed for livestock is to increase the
productivity of forage land, 4 located on soils with low by fertility 4, in
particular solonetsous. It is known that alkaline soils occupy up to 18% of
arable land crops, and they are located
mainly in zovolzhe, Zauralie, Western Siberia, as well as in Kazakhstan, the
Republic of Kazakhstan in such soil, over 70 million hectares [1].
Fertility of these soils
requires further in-depth study of the conditions of formation and development
solonetses improving techniques and methods of reclamation.
Therefore, at present, work is underway to improve the technical
means of mechanization for reclamation of soil processing.
The main focus of this work is aimed at the creation of
soil-processing machines with active, passive and combined operating units
providing intensive grinding of the soil, due to the necessity of thorough
mixing solonets horizon with carbonate to enhance the reclamation process.
The use of there machines in reclamation technology creates the
necessary conditions for directional process, improves soil fertility restoration
eliminates unfavorable characteristics and guarantees the growth of
agricultural productivity agricultural crops [2,3].
One of the important indicators determining the efficiency and
quality of reclamation processing power is crumbling soil, requirements for
which are determined by the active flow reclamation process.
In our research in terms of LLP ``Kostanaiskiy Agricultural
Research Institute``, ameliorate soil theatment littlenatrium solontsevatyh
drawn tillage provided good the crumbling of the arable layer. However, the use
of chisel PGH 2,9 in periods when the soil is excessively parched (humidity of
about 11% and hardness 5….6 MPa) caused the formation of the bottom layer of
blocks larger than 100 mm (5.8 … 10.9%) and decreased crumbling solonetzic
layer to 66.6%. The best crumbling soil, both in the lower and the upper layer
of the plow horizon was observed in areas where guns used with active working
bodies, the value of this index ranged from 78.1 …85.5% (Table 1).
Using a milling machine for surface theatment, it shows an
advantage in shows an advantage in the intensity of the multipressure soil
crumbling disking within 3.8 … 8.2%. However, increasing the intensity of
crumbling create more spray overpressure 0 … 5 cm soil layer. Contents erosion
dangerous particles less than 1 mm after milling nadsolontsovogo layer corresponded
to 19.3 … 21.2%, higher options treated disc harrow by 3.3 … 4.0%, but well
below the allowable threshold wind resistance. Reducing the sputtering of the
surface layer due to the positive torque in the design and use of a combined
machine of bar-type roller bearing, which is less than grinds and crushes soil
aggregates.
On the background of reclamation theatments mentioned advantage of
options with milling cutting up the surface layer with respect to multiple
disking.
Efficacy millind of the surface layer more clearly seen in Table
2. The data presented in it, we can say that a comparison of multiple options
and harrowing single milling against various reclamation theatments shows the
trend in yield advantages milling operation over traditional surface
layer-disking.
For example, observations on the background of the harvest
subsoiling show a slight increase. With increasing intensity of exposure to
major reclamation theatments on soil tendency to increase yields in favor of
milling.
Total difference on plantage background was 1.1 kg/ha, and on ploskorezno-processing
rotary-1.4 kg/ha, resulting in the crop growth were mathematically provable.
The average data of three bookmarks experience gain from the use
of barley harvest milling on the surface treatment was 0-9 t/ha.
Creating a predetermined degree of chopping and minimal scattering
of machining can be improved physical, mechanical and physical properties of
water- marginal solonetzic complexes and there by achieve its optimum
parameters corresponding agri-physical model of soil fertility.
And so, considering the effect of treatments on the technigues
barley yields in general, you can emphasize the efficiency-and rotary –
ploskorno plantage treatments, and surface treatment of the soil; receiving
milling tool CFA-3,6.
Summary
The
results of processing different solonetsous unproductive soil tillage. The high
efficiency and plantage ploskorezno-rotor treatments, as well as their
influence on the degree of crumbling soil and barley yields.
References
1. Azarenka Yu.A.Soderzhanie trace eiements in vegetation on soils
solonetzic complexes Omsk region // New technologies in agriculture [ Text ] –
Sb.nauch.tr.Smferopol, South Branch of the National University of Life and
Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 2011
2. Derepaskin AI Polishchuk JV, JV Binyukov Modern tools for processing
solonec and unproductive soil [ Text ] : Journal / Zemledelie. M :
2011.¹1.P.26-27
3. Makarets IK Degree of crumbling soil during processing [Text ] : Journal
/ Zemledelie.M:1982.¹2.P.23-24
Table 1- Extent of crumbling
the soil and spraying iee depending
ameliorative treatments (average of two tabs)
|
Dining surface treatments |
Layer of soil cm |
Deep tillage |
Ploskorezno-rotorno processing |
Plantage plowingx |
|||||
|
Crumbling,% |
Spraying in the layer 0…5 cm,% |
Crumbling,% |
Spraying in the layer 0…5 cm,% |
Crumbling,% |
Spraying in the layer 0…5 cm,% |
||||
|
1.disking in 4 passes instrument BDT- 7.0 |
0…20 20…40 0…40 |
74,3 72,6 73,6 |
16,0 |
72,9 84,1 78,5 |
13,8 |
77,0 74,6 75,8 |
8,2 |
||
|
2.single milling tool CFA-3,6 |
|
78,1 73,9 76,0 |
19,3 |
81,1 85,5 83,3 |
21,2 |
81,3 77,3 79,3 |
7,6 |
||
x- disking in two passes instrument BDT-7,0
Table
2- Productivity of barley depending on the number of the conducted superficial
treatments
(average
of three tabs)
|
Variants of experience |
Productivity of
barley, c/ga |
General middle |
||||||||||||||||
|
Deep tillage |
Ploskorezno-rotorno processing |
Plantage plowingx |
||||||||||||||||
|
¹ of the sown culture
after steam |
||||||||||||||||||
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
middle |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
middle |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
middle |
||||
|
1.disking in 4 passes instrument BDT-7.0 |
5,8 |
11,8 |
7,7 |
14,3 |
9,9 |
7,3 |
13,7 |
8,7 |
17,5 |
11,8 |
6,6 |
14,5 |
9,2 |
18,9 |
12,3 |
11,3 |
||
|
2.single milling tool CFA-3,6 |
5,4 |
12,1 |
7,7 |
15,0 |
10,0 |
8,1 |
15,5 |
9,5 |
18,0 |
13,2 |
8,0 |
16,4 |
9,8 |
19,5 |
13,4 |
12,2 |
||
x- there is disking double of this background