Economic sciences

Kazhikova Zh.N. senior teacher.

Zhanabergenova G. snudent

Kostanaysky state university of A.Baytursynov,

Kazakhstan

Unamortized intangible assets.

Currently, the competitiveness and profitability of many enterprises is largely determined by their ability to adapt - to the dynamic changes occurring in the internal - and external operational environment . With the development of market relations, the speed and scale, technological change is not possible to ensure the competitiveness only by using the available material and financial factors. Of particular interest to economic agents to raise questions related to the use of organizations in the intangible factors , often existing corporations , but not in their financial statements.

The reason for this is primarily a methodological study is not legal, tax and accounting aspects. However, even at this point in time, recognizing and appreciating the value of reporting certain types of intangible assets, such as goodwill, trademarks, etc., most businesses will have the opportunity at no additional cost to make more reliable and attractive their financial situation for investors, thus will be able to increase the share capital of the company.

Presence of non-current assets Intangible assets increases the market value of the organization, increasing its investment attractiveness, protects against unfair competition, helps to optimize production costs and commercial activities, provides a "competitive advantage in domestic and foreign markets, etc., but little attention in the accounting this category by accountants reduces quality financial statements.

Intangible assets represent one of the most complex accounting. This is due not only to recognize their problems in accounting and reporting, but also the complexity and uncertainty in their assessment and life. When you create , redistribution and involvement in commercial circulation of intangible assets raises many problematic aspects associated with their use , accounting, management , auditing and analysis. Imperfection of the legislation , the lack of a clear classification of intangible assets , the lack of theoretical elaboration accounting methodology , evaluation and audit of intangible assets - these and other problems are now becoming very relevant for research in the field of accounting .

The extent of a problem. Theoretical questions of identification and classification of 'intangible assets in accounting has been a wide range of Russian and foreign scientists, including J. Bernard, NA Blatov, RJ Weitzman, P. Gerstner, JB Dyumarshe, MH Zhebrak, J. Zappa, J. Canning, N. Cypress  F,-K. Collie, V. Jle Cutro, Limperg T., J. Savary, EE Sievers, IF Sherr; Shmalenbah O., et al

Research and address current issues related to the procedure involved in accounting for provisions such authoritative contemporary authors as AS Tank, NA Beekeeper, NV Generalova, LV Gorbatova, AV Vlasov, VB Ivashkevich, VV Kovalev, MI Cooter,

Theoretical and practical significance of these studies - is to make recommendations to improve the current regulatory framework and accounting practices Unamortized intangible assets, as well as analysis techniques to build goodwill and efficiency of franchise operations, which may be reflected in the Methodical recommendations on accounting and analysis .

Expressed in the works of practical recommendations can be used a wide range of organizations in the accounting policy, in the process of business transactions to incorporate non-depreciable intangible assets in the accounts, as well as in the analysis of information about their formation and use.

However, accounting of non-depreciable intangible assets are of interest of an increasing number of specialists in the field of accounting. Development of market economy, the emergence of new forms of financial relationships, need updating production potential explains the need to improve the existing regulatory framework, bringing it closer to international practice.

 

Literature

1. Intangible assets. Practical handbook / Edited by VI Scala. Almaty LLP "Publisher LEM», 2008. - 140.

2. Kozyrev AN Assessment of intellectual property. M.: Expert Bureau. -2009.

3. V. Nazarov Intangible assets / / Accounting practice. -2007. - № 6 (43).-C. 2-10.