Doctor of economic Sciences Kruglov V. N.

Institute of management, business and technology, Kaluga, Russia

Innovation management: new opportunities

 

Key words. Investment, innovation, region, economy, the dynamics of growth, territorial development, provision of resources, tools, models.
         Abstract. The article examines the possibility of introducing in the management of the real sector of the economy of new models and tools. Discusses the possibility of modeling foreign experience. Refers to the need of targeted support of the process. Given the findings and recommendations.

 

Unstable economic conditions have a negative impact on the development of companies. Economic sanctions, lower oil prices, the stagnation of the economy, slowing growth rates, increasing the debt burden, devaluation, recession and inflation, combined with political instability adversely affect economic activity in different countries of the world. But the new call arise along with new opportunities for further development of the producers. In difficult conditions the needed real exchange rate on the new industrialization, creating new jobs, diversification of the economy in the innovation scenario, which is the best preventive measure to ensure economic stability before making any threats. The growth of investment attractiveness is one of the goals is improving the competitiveness of the economy as a whole, and promote the development of the national innovation system [1. p.27].

At the present stage of development there are different approaches to the assessment of innovative activity of regions, which prevents an objective assessment of the effectiveness of the efforts of regional and Federal authorities. Therefore, the aim of the article is identifying the best regions according to the results of various ratings, whose activities should be subject to replication and adaptation in other regions.

A special place to identify the best regional practices and regional leaders has been elevated as national rankings and international companies [2, p. 214].

Only 6 Russian cluster received the bronze label. This cluster of Moscow, Ulyanovsk, Kaluga and Samara regions, Perm territory and the Republic of Tatarstan.

Among domestic ratings note the national rating of investment climate in subjects of the Russian Federation. This rating assesses the factors creating a favorable investment climate and the effectiveness of regional authorities aimed at improving the investment climate in the region. The methodology of calculation of indicators of the ranking is a multi-level system of 54 in 2014 and 50 in 2015 indicators (grouped into 18 factors) and formulas of aggregation, which are normalized values and build an integrated estimation. In the pilot testing participated 21 region.

The first group in 2015 includes 5 regions: Kaluga, Belgorod, Tambov, Ulyanovsk regions and the Republic of Tatarstan. As a result of rating of subjects of the Russian Federation are grouped in 5 groups.

The ranking is the city of Moscow and Tatarstan, and the regions named above. These regions formed the first group in terms RRII. The second group included 24 regions, the third regions 40. The rating regions of the fourth group (15 subjects of the Russian Federation).

Also noteworthy and innovative companies rating "TECHUSPECH". This rating is an effective tool for the search and promotion of promising companies in the Russian Federation, which, with the support of the state can become players in the international market of innovations. In the ranking can participate in the company meet certain minimum eligibility requirements such as age of the company, revenue for the year, the average annual rate of revenue growth, average annual expenditures on R & d, innovation and income from the sale of innovative products. [2, p. 212]. The winners are determined in four categories: the largest companies in the greatest amount of revenue; fast-growing companies for the greatest rate of revenue growth; innovative company on the share of new products in the revenue, expenditure on R & d and technological innovation; the export potential for the share of exports in revenues of the company.

In the TOP 10 according to the ranking for the period from 2012 to 2015 included companies representing the above regions, as well as representing Leningrad, Sverdlovsk, Chelyabinsk, Novosibirsk region, Chuvash Republic [3].

The necessity of rating of innovative development of regions, the effectiveness of efforts of regional and Federal authorities to facilitate this and the subsequent identification of best market practices in different regions due to the realities of the sole and uncontested choice for the economy – innovations. The identification of already established practices of innovation development, as well as practices to facilitate this, with a view to subsequent replication of these practices in other regions (after appropriate adaptation measures) is an effective tool for development.

 

Literature:

1. Bortnik I. M., et al. the Formation of innovative clusters in Russia: the first years // Innovations. – 2015. – ¹ 7(201). – P. 26-36.

2. Kruglov V. N., Spiders S. A. national rating as a tool to promote companies // Scientific and production journal "Science" : Special issue "Economics and management" // Materials of VII international scientific-practical conference "Science and innovations – strategic development priorities of the economy and the state". – 2016. – ¹ 4-3. – P. 212-216.

3. The national rating of Russian high-tech rapidly developing companies "Techuspech" [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.ratingtechup.ru/ (accessed 21.03.2016).