Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè/Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû îáðàçîâàíèÿ
Senior Instructor, Toimbaeva B. M.
Karaganda State Technical University, Kazakhstan
Integrating
project based learning
There has been increasing emphasis in recent years on
moving away from traditional teaching towards more student-centered learning. Projects
are an integral part of student-centered learning process. There
are many benefits of project work. Use of projects ‘establishes a direct link between
language learning and its application’, as well as allows learners to develop
their interactive and communicative abilities, fostering independence,
enhancing cooperative learning skills; developing decision-making, critical
thinking. Project-based learning is a dynamic approach to teaching in which
students explore real-world problems and challenges. With this type of active
and engaged learning, students are inspired to obtain a deeper knowledge of the
subjects they’re studying.
The article highlights the practice and experience of
implementing project work and how projects and related activities can be
integrated into English classes. The paper attempts to describe a science
project designed for engineering students at Karaganda state technical
university. The groups are composed of students of mixed levels of English
proficiency and they are introduced to a one-semester course of Technical
English. The overall goal of the Foreign Languages Department is to provide
students with a foundation in English scientific terminology so they can do
presentations on their scientific and laboratory work. Students are focused on
communication tasks that can be applied in research work, such as brainstorming
ideas, testing theories, demonstrating processes, and giving presentations.
Well-designed projects ask students to:
1. Deal with real problems and issues that have importance to people;
2. Actively engage in their learning and make important choices;
3. Demonstrate learned key concepts and skills
Whether students work individually, in pairs, or in
groups, the instructor’s role is to serve as a coach, guiding students to use a
variety of resources, employ a strategy that is fun and motivating, and uncover
content with depth and breadth. If we examine project-based learning in the most
general way, we can break it down into the following three steps:
1. Classroom planning;
2. Carrying out the project;
3. Reviewing and monitoring the project work.
In the classroom planning stage, the learner and
instructor negotiate the project theme, language needs, and various ways to
reach the outcome. It is in this stage that learners engage in controlled and
then, less controlled linguistic practice. The second stage focuses on outside
work where learners have autonomy in performing “real” tasks such as taking
part in interviews and preparing materials. The final stage involves reflection
and obtaining student feedback.
The other project guide, a journal article written by Alan
and Stoller (2005) provides a ten-step procedure that can be adapted and applied
to project planning:
1. Students and instructor agree on a project.
2. Students and instructor determine the final outcome of the project.
3. Students and instructor structure the project.
4. Instructor prepares students for information gathering.
5. Students gather information.
6. Instructor prepares students for compiling and analyzing data.
7. Students compile and analyze information.
8. Instructor prepares students for the final activity.
9. Students present the final product.
10. Students evaluate the project.
The basic framework for designing the science project
for engineering students consists of both in-class and out-of classwork. The
in-class activities focus on the learning and production of content material
for presentation. The out-of-class work requires students to gather information, divide
responsibilities, assign tasks, and organize the presentation. The
remainder of the class period is allocated for project planning and weekly
briefings. Once the project teams are set up, the group leader is responsible
for providing periodic updates on their progress and reporting any change in
plans. For their presentations, students explain a particular process, design a
review, and give a technical report. For example, students describe how to set
up an electronic circuit board or how to light a bulb using wires.
Any project work needs evaluation. Quality project
assessment involves both formative and summative feedback. During the project,
students reflect on their own progress, receive formative feedback from peers
and teachers, and have opportunities to improve their work and address issues
raised by reviewers. At the end of the project, summative evaluations of
student products and performances are provided by instructors who judge student
work in relation to predetermined quality indicators as described on project
rubrics.
Project-based learning has earned the endorsement of
many practitioners, largely because of its reported positive effects on
students’ motivation, language skills, ability to function in groups, content
learning, self-confidence, autonomy and willingness to take responsibility for own
learning, and decision-making abilities.
References:
1. Andi Stix & Frank Hrbek (2006).
Teachers as Classroom Coaches: How to Motivate Students?
2. Carney, N., & Foss, P.
(2008). Student-produced video: Two approaches.
English Teaching Forum, 2, 14-19.
3. Gulbahar H. Beckett and Tammy
Slater (2005). The Project Framework: a
tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, vol.59/2, pp.
108-116.
4. Stoller, F.L. Project work: A
means to promote language and content. Forum
35/4, 2002
5. Alec Patton. (2012)Work That
Matters: Teacher’s guide to project-based learning. High Tech High, California.
http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/work-matters-teacher’s-guide-project-based-learning