Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå
íàóêè
Assoc.
prof. Natalija Šedžiuvienė
Šiauliai state college, Lithuania
EDUCATIONAL BASICS
OF INDIVIDUAL
PROFESSIONAL BECOMING OF COLLEGE TEACHERS
Individual experience of teachers,
perceiving one‘s self as an instance of the subject‘s activities in the teacher
career is becoming one of the pre-conditions for Professional development.
However, modern educology still targets at general requirements for a teacher‘s
work rather than his/her Professional individuality.
It is impossible to realize the new
paradigm of humanistic education without the quintessence of perception of an
educator‘s personality, aim, content and characteristics of professional
development. All this cannot proceed without an expression of professional
individuality, which realizes the humanistic potential of educating.
Nevertheless, solving of such problems in educology still encounters a number
of obstacles: the boundaries, fields and goals of teacher activities, the
realization of which depend on a teacher‘s individuality are not sufficiently
defined, because everything what is individual is referred to as a common
element.
Processes of individual professional
becoming of college teachers have not been researched, but they continuously
foster interest of scholars as there is growing
tendency to assess
a teacher in
terms of his/her individuality, uniqueness and
individual style (Pukelis, 2004).
Study and practice of educology
tackles an issue of an individual professional development of teacher in
different ways: such development is often attributed to factual, experience-based
rather than abstract knowledge. However, in an everyday life a teacher as a
cognisant subject is constantly involved in processes of self-knowledge and
interacts with a problem of self-identity, as a personality is not a ready-made
present, it is developed, projected by efforts of an individual, who chants,
yet preserves the entirety of his/her existence (Kuzmina,1999).
Modern education more and often
enables a teacher to get involved into
self-realization where self- control and self-
reflection become both
a tool to cross pedagogical
barriers and a pre-condition for an individual expression( Kuzmina, 1999;
Kruteckij, 1997). The following contradictions are
often dominant analyzing processes of an individual professional development of
teachers:
∙ it is perceived that in a reality
of educating a teacher does not depend on parameters of his/her personality,
but rather acts as a performer of pedagogical functions, and he/she
disregards the fact that due to certain
features of his/her personality, cannot properly realize a number of functions
(Kagan, Kogan, 1997; Cole, 1996);
∙ a teacher is mostly attributed to
subject of low psychological differentiation, who prefers team rather than
individual activities and is successful in communicating; therefore perception
of professional eligibility, a system of psychological characteristics having
impact on individual professional capacity receive insufficient attention
(Maddern, 1994; Lickona, 1991);
∙ self-control and self-correction
are perceived as a tool for overcoming pedagogical barriers of an individual
expression, but it is not established how they inhibit acceptation of a new
role both in actual and imaginary situations (Marton, Wenestam, 1988).
An individual professional expression
of a teacher is hardly noticeable externally, therefore, it is little analyzed.
A process of individual professional development tends to be viewed as a key
factor pre-determining a professional level, whereas self-perception is
associated to a new competence of self-projection and civilized professional
existence. A teacher as a subject of professional activities is analyzed in
terms of a structured personality and a subjective, active plane appearing as
an impetus for improvement, based on certain values, knowledge and skills.
A system of teacher characteristics
has been analyzed which belongs to internal structures ensuring stability of a
personality, importance in the pedagogical career, but an individual expression
is being analyzed as an internal radius of a subject exceeding boundaries of actual interactions with ”other“, as
development in a personality of “another“.
The culture of development of professional “ego“ is considered in
a certain educational framework and decentralization of personality towards
characteristics defining individuality is established. It is claimed that a new
approach to professional development is characteristic to teacher, which is
associated with a different type of thought, behavior, self-realization as a
learner, as free and responsible individuals.
The following problems are to be salved:
∙
the competencies determining individual professional becoming of
teachers have not been established;
∙
educational basics of professional
becoming remain vague along with the question what psychological aspects are
significant for individual professional becoming and what possibilities a
teacher has for self-knowledge and self-help;
∙
it has not been determined how a teacher becomes a subject of conscious
activities and how he/she gets involved into cognition processes and interacts
with a problem of self-identification of professional individuality, and
whether he/she has an opportunity to become a subject perceiving one‘s self and
involved in individual professional self-realization.
Conclusions
and generalizations:
∙ educational grounds of individual professional becoming of
college teachers consists of social, psychological processes and personality
traits, which represent teachers’ integral
professional self- awareness manageable by educational means;
∙ individual
professional becoming may be promoted in the following ways: by developing viewing oneself as a free,
responsible individual, projecting characteristics of professional expression
on the basis of perception of “intra” and “inter” characteristics, targeting at
perception of the core of individual professional creativity and
decentralization to individuality via processes of self-identification,
self-regulation and self-control;
∙ a teacher becomes a subject of
conscious practice when he/she: gets involved in processes of self-knowledge
and interacts with a problem of self-identification of professional
individuality; has an opportunity to become self-cognisant subject, involved in
professional self-realization as a
self-monitoring and self-perceiving individual, who continuously
improves processes of educational knowledge and self-projecting;
∙ individual professional becoming of
college teachers is a creative process
of self- help acting as a pre-requisite of professional reflection. Once the
reflection becomes intellectual, retrospective, one strives to actualize those
components, which might influence crossing of barriers of individual
professional expression by educational means.
Literature:
1.Cole M. (1996).
Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline.Cambridge, Massachusetts and
London, England.
2.Kagan J., Kogan
N. (1997). Individual variation in cognitive professes // P.H.Mussen
3.Lickona T.
(1991). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and
Resposibility. New York.
4.Maddern J.
(1994). Accelerate Learning. Accelerated Learning centre, Bristol.
5.Marton F.,
Wenestam C.G. (1988. Qualitative differences in retention when a text is read
several times. Practical Aspects of memory: Current Reserch and Issyes, vol 2.
6.Pukelis K.
(2004). Mokytojų rengimo idealinio modelio parametrai: monografija. Kaunas, VDU.
7.Êðóòåöêèé Â.À. (1997). Îñíîâû ïåäàãîãè÷åñêîé ïñèõîëîãèè. – Ì.
8.Êóçìèíà Í.Â. (1999). Ïðîôåññèîíàëüíàÿ äåÿòåëüíîñòü
ïðåïîäàâàòåëÿ è ìàñòåðà ïðîèçâîäñòâåííîãî îáó÷åíèÿ ïðôòåõó÷èëèùà. – Ì.