History/2.General  History

 

Nurusheva Gulmira Keldybaevna, Chiypesh M., student of the 2nd course, region study

 

Kazakhstan,Kostanay State University named after A.Baitursynov

 

Development of fisheries in the Turgay region in the late XIX century and early XX centuries

 

Most strongly developed, seasonal work in areas with mixed Kazakh-Russian population. In Russian villages, the development of capitalism was going faster than the Kazakh aule. Russian fists greater demand for seasonal workers, especially in the fall during the harvest. As Kazakh seasonal workers were the most inexpensive labor force, Russian fists most willingly take them to work.

Patriarchal-feudal elite of Kazakhstan bay, paid great attention, mainly engaged in trade. For example, according to the expedition to the territory Turgay area, large bay who had an average per farm for 500 head of cattle are growing stronger, and also engaged in a major trade.

In the northern complex pastoral-agricultural regions of Kazakhstan dissolution of the old mode of production went much more intensively than in the most remote from the railways, markets and Russian villages, pastoral areas.

In pastoral-agricultural areas, many farms gradually reformed bay on capitalist lines, replacing practicing hired labor.

In place of a simple primitive means of production come modern wooden plow replaces the iron plow.

It should be noted that in northern Turgay area merchants and moneylenders invested their capital and not only in commercial enterprises, but also in production, the improvement of their farms by purchasing agricultural machinery, s top breeds of cattle, etc. This is evidenced by the following fact, for example in the county Kustanai on every major bay economy, which had 500 head of cattle, buildings accounted for 11 and 32 agricultural implements.

In the remote pastoral areas of commodity economy almost got its development. Hiring of labor and seasonal work in the history of the southern region of great significance had not, compared to the northern region: there remained not the most advanced forms of farming.

Thus, it is determined that a comprehensive pastoral-agricultural regions of Kazakhstan, under the influence of a number of reasons, mainly the resettlement of Russian peasants, the old modes of production were destroyed, and in the late 19th century in these areas had all the elements of the contradictions inherent in Diverse commodity economy. In underdeveloped areas preserved nomadic primitive forms of agriculture.

To confirm the position of the present some comparative data on individual townships Kustanai and Aktobe counties Turgay region:

name townships

Total farms

With fisheries management

Farms emit laborers

Farms employ workers

total

% Of the total number

total

% Of the total number

total

% Of the total number

Kustanaisky county

1. Chubarskaya

2. Arkhangelsk

3. Keneralskaya

 

 

1975

1643

1378

 

 

700

491

1086

 

 

35,0

29,9

79,5

 

 

605

276

246

 

 

30,6

16,8

17,8

 

 

1000

576

381

 

 

50,6

35,0

27,6

Aktobe county

1. Terektinsky

2. Tuztobinskaya

3.Bestamakskaya

 

1728

1978

1758

 

948

878

520

 

54,9

44,4

29,6

 

575

426

317

 

33,3

21,5

18,0

 

594

985

624

 

34,4

49,8

35,5

[2]

 

As can be seen already in the late 19th century in all parishes Kustanai, Aktobe counties with the number of farms and fisheries released laborers increases significantly. Takots accelerated pace of expansion of the Kazakh economy in these counties is explained by the fact that these counties, first, limiting settlement areas were displaced and, secondly, the fact that they were located close to railways and major cities such as Orenburg, Omsk, Kustanai.

In areas where Kazakhs in connection with the relocation of peasants moved to settled agriculture and, most notably in the village was the penetration of capitalist relations of elements. Archaic forms of economy collapsed precipitously proiskhodtlo bundle in the village. As for the nomadic areas, there trade-usurer's capital, on the contrary, delaying old production.

 

Literature:

1.CSA RK, f.29., 36., L.6