UDK 159.922:316.64:165.242.2+34:008

 

Dmitrienko Y.N., Ph.D., bread-winner of scientific degree of doctor of legal sciences of the Kiev National research university the name of T. Shevchenko (Kyiv city) 

GOING  IS NEAR|to| RESEARCH|work-up| OF LAW OF I OF LEGAL STRUCTURE: PROBLEM  METHODOLOGICALLY LEGAL COMMUNICATIONS

 

 Philosophical-legal ("methodologically is a legal" (D.A.Kerimov) concept|notion| of law as maximum causal - systembuildung| after  own  special  nature in relation to|toward| a right for consequences| legal maintenance| where a right is|appear| at the same time|simultaneously| his|its|  purposeprescribed|but| by structurebuild| reason|cause| of theology| development. It reflects in the reproduced| (to the methodological| context) from matterform at law (invariant of formsubstance| sense of justice with a dominant|leit-motif| system elements) by volume of are nonlinear possibilities|potentialitie| him evolutional transformations and  requires the transcendent understanding concretely - historical transedetails| of traditional positive|staid|  sense  of justice as system  essence  of peflexion| life of posttotality| of right [1|q.v.|].

As a dominant|leit-motif|, evolutional priority and functionally|function| claimed (but methodologically not adapted)  matterform parameters of socially| macrostructures|structure| changes|changing| of kvazimethodological order of transitional lawtranformation|, removing|reflects| structural|structure| descriptions  of devivant rigthconsciousness|, lawunderstanding, worldideology essence (naturally family|hereditary|)  necessities|need| on paradigm levels|Y-level| of both external, heterogeneously| in a axial| plane|flatness|  and internal|inlying|, homogeneously not | influences of | axial order on creation of legal awareness of devivantal| rigthconsciousness | in forms|shape| nationally adapted lawmeasuring, representational and| necessity of theoretic| consideration methodologically world view correlation ideological functional|function| to the closeness of law  (legislative  truth)  and  legal structure (legal idea) in  the context of legal law  and legal structure accordingly|according| them othersourse| | determinant-indeterminant| origin and correlation.

So the othersourse| motive-consequence|, determinant-indeterminant| correlation of legal law and  legal structure (form|shape| of devivantal rigthconsciousness as devivantal| legal system and maintenancedevivantal| sense of justice as structure) on all methodology| and all functional| levels|Y-level|, consider|think|, can be begun from a theoretical answer for  such two fundamental philosophical-legal question:

              a) in which|what| methodologically legal  to the measure legal structures present|represent| methodical character|nature| of legal law communicative;

              b) after which|what| methodologically - a legal limit|border| functionally|function| are nonlinear, theological functional| is structured|structure-forming|, legal maintenance structural|structure| copulas|truss| (transitions|transgressing|)  of both legal law  with sociallegal reality and in a legal law at the level of him legal and unlegal structural|structure| and system elements.

Question about philosophical-legal as methodologically legal  specific of existence of natural|real-life|, mentally structured|structure-forming|, conformities to law and legal laws of creation of certain|definite| legal structures  unlike  the features of unlegal conformities to law be - which|what| other natural|real-life| laws of motion|movement| or development are inalienably required active consideration of question about functional|function| priority  of dominant|leit-motif| of methodology philosophy| mediated| and  systematization of existence of evolutional, synergistically adjusted, features of structure (forms|shape|)  of laws  in maintenance of legal consciousness|intelligent| as metatheory for relation|referring|, for example|eg|, to|by| the theory of the state and right.

        LITERARURE 

         1. Gegel' G. Science logic.- M.: Science,  2009. – 258 p.