Technical Sciences. Traffic

Stepanov Oleksiy

PhD in Technical Sciences, associate professor in KhNAHU, Ukraine

Factor of human visual perception in the motor vehicle safety system

 

The specific feature of researches of the motor vehicle safety system is combination of solving technical problems (active and passive safety) with the study of psychophysiology of perception of the road traffic by the road users [5]. This approach allows obtaining the data that, as main provisions, adequately reflect the process of visual perception as a human factor of road users in the motor vehicle safety system [1]. The perception is a unity of sense and logic, sense and meaning, feeling and thinking. By means of visual perception, a person does not only see, but also hears and listens. The process of perception, which may be difficult to some extent, is the solution to a specific task. For example, visual perception allows driver to obtain objective information about the external environment and gives the principal opportunity for decision-making depending on the road situation and the behavior of other road users. The main questions about the process of visual perception by the driver are substantially related to the problems of invariant selection and recognition of objects located on a background of other objects, partially overlapping each other. Solving these problems is greatly important for processing of information by a driver in order to maintain safety of his (her) motor vehicle and traffic in general.

Study of psychophysiological mechanisms of the process of visual perception of a human as a road user is one of the main conditions of ensuring road safety. Without the study of human psychology and physiology, such factors as ambiguity of time of reaction for the same signal or changes in time of reaction of a driver or reduction of time of reaction in cases of lassitude compared to the period of optimal performance cannot be explained.

The scientists’ researches [1-3, 7] specify that information processing is not only passive reflection of statistical characteristics of a signal, but also active search for a solution, especially in real situations. As an example, we may examine the consistent perception of information stretched in time. In this way, a person learns the world. When we look at the picture, we see it in whole, and it appears immediately before us in its completeness.

The possibility of obtaining quantitative estimates of transmission and reception of information allowed W. Hick to obtain linear connection between the time of reaction and information capacity of the signal, considering the formula of C. Shannon for estimating the amount of information. This connection, later called “Hick’s law”, was repeatedly confirmed by experiments with simple stimuli, and the model of formation of the reaction time was called “information model” [5].

At perception of moving road objects, the driver can identify these objects as those belonging to one or another class depending on the original points of regard of the driver. While driving, the driver abruptly switches to different versions of an ambiguous object, depending on the fragment from which he or she starts the recognition and, therefore, depending on the perceptual way used by him or her to interpret all other elements [7]. It can be believed that the effect of inversion in perception of “reversible” figures may be explained in the same way. A particular version of vision of the test image by the driver is the result of the “perceptual image” first involved in identification [4, 6, 8, 9].

Analyzing the literature sources [2, 3, 4, 6], we can conclude that there are two different ways in which the macro (psychological) and the micro (neural) levels of the process of human visual perception are studied. Thus, despite a complete process image, which includes the data of both levels, there is a gap between the data received on the level of functioning of individual neurons and the data obtained in the study of characteristics of perception as a single process [7].

Analysis of the obtained results allows distinguishing the types of errors at the stage connected with the mechanisms of recognition of the object based on its parts. The effect of partial recognition of all the figure elements by the driver, when he identifies only some of them (always identifying different elements at repeated presentations), is essential. This phenomenon of visual perception can be considered as presentation of the mechanism of deficiency of attention of the driver.

The analysis of errors of perception of the road network by the driver allows identification of deviations of psycho-physiological characteristics of individual mini-stages of process of visual perception during driver’s training (or proficiency check) [1, 2, 6]. Errors connected with perception fragmentation at recognition of subjects may occur in case of existence of lesions (injuries) in temporal brain area and near it; errors in recognition of spatial situations – in case of existence of lesions in parietal areas. Lesions of symmetrical regions of subdominant brain hemisphere cause impairments of other parts of imaging, such as ability to complete visual perception, ability to recognize specific familiar objects [8, 9]. These features of factor of visual perception and identification of the road environment by road users shall be considered in the motor vehicles and traffic safety system.

References:

1. Бондарко В. М. К вопросу о восприятии целостности зрительных объектов / Бондарко В. М., Шелепин Ю. Л. // Сенсорные системы. ― 1996, Т. 10, № 1. ― С. 25–30.

2. Глезер В. Д. Зрительное опознание и его нейрофизиологические механизмы / В. Д. Глезер. ― Л.: Наука, 1975.

3. Капран В. И. Фрагментация стабилизированного образа как средство изучения микрогенеза восприятия / В. И. Капран // Исследование функциональной структуры исполнительной деятельности. Труды ВНИИТЭ. Эргономика. ― 1980, № 19. ― С. 122–133.

4. Кроль В. М. Зрительное узнавание как управляемый поиск сложных фрагментов / В. М. Кроль // Сенсорные системы. ― 1995, № 1. ― С. 58–67.

5. Лобанов Е.М. Проектирование дорог и организация движения с учетом психофизиологии водителя / Е. М. Лобанов. ― М.: Транспорт, 1980. ― 311 с.

6. Невская А. А. Временные характеристики опознания предметных изображений при фильтрации высоких пространственных частот / А. А. Невская // Физиология человека. ― 1987, Т. 13, № 5. ― С. 757766.

7. Goolkaasian P. The effect of size on the perception of ambiguous figures // Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 1991. V. 29, N 2. P. 161 164.

8. Jordan T. R. Superiority over single letters and influence of postmark boundaries // J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. and Perform. 1990. V. 16, N 4. P. 893909.

9. Snak M. D., Walker J. T. Figureground organization of real and subjective contours: A new ambiguous figures, some novel measures of ambiguity and apparent distance across regions of figure and ground // Percept. and Psychophys. ― 1989. ― V. 46, N 2. ― P. 127–138.