Education / 5. Modern teaching methods.
K.-agricultural
sciences., Yust N. A., k. - agricultural sciences.,
Shelkovkina N.S.
Far Eastern State Agrarian University, Russia
Advanced
Methods of assessing students
Four-point rating
system in the exam existing at the university and suitable approach to it is
not taken into account with the quality and effectiveness of different types of
student work throughout the semester. Practice shows that the accumulation of
knowledge by students is uneven, so knowledge obtained during tests or examinations
is not strong and deep. Thus, the rating system of knowledge involves continuous
monitoring for the duration of the study subjects. The system allows the
teacher to find an individual approach to each student. Now the teacher must
find ways to evaluate the performance of all students group, whereas not all
students respond actively in the classroom.
Students and
teachers need continuous cooperation throughout the educational process, which
has a positive effect on the development of their personal qualities. Rating is
not only a tool for evaluating performance, but also a kind of tool of educational
work. The teacher can also be more creative in his approach to the creation and
implementation of teaching methods, as method of rating systems are much less
regulated over. It is necessary for a successful rating control to rely on
developed at the university regulations on the rating system of assessing
students and teacher guidelines. Document defining the work of teachers and
students in the semester, is a top plan that provides detailed educational and
methodological information on discipline in accordance with the schedule of
classes [1].
So developing the
rating system evaluation of training activities for the course "Water
supply and sanitation with the basics of hydraulics," considered six parameters:
presence on the lectures; lecture notes, synopsis and protection of laboratory
work, case studies, oral response and intellectual activity in the classroom;
execution of the test assignment; independent work in the form of abstract or
summary, table 1 damper motor is one possible rating training activities, in
gradebook mark exhibited by traditional 4-point scale or record "credited".
Types of
monitoring and maximum number of points earned on each as a control for whatever
discipline is determined by their respective departments or leading a class
teacher (with the necessary approval of the department).
Table 1
Approximate distribution of points on the training
modules discipline
|
Types of control |
The maximum number of points for the training module |
Deadlines |
|
Training Module 1 water supply |
15 |
1-4 week of the semester |
|
Training Module 2 Wastewater |
15 |
5-8 week of the semester |
|
Training Module 3 Sanitary equipment buildings |
10 |
9-12 week of the semester |
|
Training Module 4 Basics of hydraulics |
15 |
13-16 week of the semester |
|
Class attendance |
15 |
Entire semester |
|
Passing the exam |
30 |
Sessional week |
|
Total of |
100 |
|
CW control work;
TR -tipovoy calculation; ZLR -Protection labs.
Motivation students to timely implementation
of the tasks provided for the promotion of students putting "bonus"
points (no more than 15 credits per semester) at a rate of timely submission of
K. For example, the student passes and protects the early work (as shown in
Table. 1) on the maximum number of points - 10 (Table. 2).
Table 2
Timeliness factor
delivery job
|
Completion date |
K |
|
Ahead of schedule |
1,2 |
|
In the period |
1 |
|
1st week |
0,8 |
|
2nd week |
0,6 |
|
The following weeks |
0,2 |
Scoring in the
study of discipline "Water supply and sanitation with the fundamentals of
hydraulics" and the corresponding estimates are shown in Table 3.
Table
3
|
Points per semester |
Points for the exam |
Total score |
Final Evaluation |
|
61 70 (>70) |
0 30 |
81 100 (> 100) 72 80 |
«5» «4» |
|
51 60 |
0 30 |
72 80 ≥ 81 |
«4» «5» |
|
41 50 |
0 30 |
52 71 72 80 |
«3» «4» |
|
31 40 |
0 30 |
52 71 |
«3» |
|
|
|
< 30 |
«2» |
30If the student during
the semester did not receive the minimum number of points (30), it is
considered to be underachieving and not allowed for the exam in the discipline
during the examination session, as the teacher informs the dean. He is given
the opportunity to pass boundary control (examination) after the end of the
session during mulligans. To ensure the objectivity of the evaluation results
of performance it is necessary to provide students with all kinds of
educational and methodical literature, reporting and create equality of initial
conditions [2].
References:
1. Korneenkov, SS rating system monitoring student performance in high
school / SS Korneenkov // Innovation by universities: the state, problems and
prospects: proceedings of a regional scientific-methodical conference. - 2009.
- S.94-98
2. Shelkovkina N.S., Yust N.A. Improving the objectivity of the evaluation
of students' knowledge in high school (article) Bulletin of the Far Eastern
Regional Training Center: Information and Analytical sbornik.-Vladivostok:
Dalnevost. Federal. University Press, 2014.- S.176-181
3.
Shelkovkina N.S., Yust N.A. Ballroom-rating system as a way to ensure objective evaluation of
student performance Innovative technologies in improving the quality of
education: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Blagoveshchensk, ed.
DalGAU, 2014 - pp 95-100