Ô³ëîëîã³÷í³ íàóêè/ Ìîâà, ìîâëåííÿ, ìîâëåííºâà êîìóí³êàö³ÿ/

                  Alina M.Melnikova, Donbas State Technical University

 

 The Art of Making Conversation

According to the Linguistic Oxford Society opinion, the word “conversation” is merely identified as an informal talk involving a small group of people [1;335]. However, it can not be restricted only by its few defining lines represented since “conversation” embraces much more cognitive meanings. The particular task of this report to reveal its core sense and significance via an intensive language search and lingual investigation.

Originally, the ancient Romans and Greeks who were the very forefathers of such unexplored sciences as philosophy and psychology put their minds to the art of conversation as far as its importance was rapidly recognized by the most prominent scholars of that time. Cicero, writing in 44 B.C., was the first who remarked in his essay On Duties that nobody had yet set down the rules for ordinary conversation, though many had done so for public speaking. Cicero, a prominent writer and philosopher, promoted the analogy of conversation rules, which usage presupposes the obtaining of conversation competence [3;146]. Apparently, the chain of recommendations given in his On Duties seem to be extremely facile to follow. However, their assistance should not be denied. It is gravely to accentuate the list of essential rules for the best conversationalist Cicero was quick-witted to create. Here are the conversation rules by Cicero: 1 speak clearly; 2 speak easily, but not too much; 3 do not interrupt; 4 be courteous; 5 deal seriously with serious matters and gracefully with lighter ones; 6 never criticize people behind their backs; 7 stick to subjects of general interest; 8 do not talk about yourself; 9 never lose your temper.

It would be reasonably to mention that lately a great number of books and encyclopedias on the art of conversation that might be perfected began to appear with rapid succession. In order to satisfy the demands of insatiable American society to be educated more broadly in “the fine art of getting along”, Dale Carnegie who was widely called a teacher of public speaking and devoted most of his time to the language investigation published his book How to Win Friends and Influence People [2;107]. He deeply believed that the availability of proper communicative skills can become the best letter of recommendation for every intelligent personality who has a lust for life and career prospect. A proper advice can be derived from his point that is “the real art of conversation is not only to say the right thing in the right place, but to leave unsaid the wrong thing at the tempting moment” which in its turn was compiled as the by-Carnegie-formula of a successful conversation making. After my close research of Carnegie’s reports and essays on the subject considered it would be better to make some generalization and systematization processes. Due to my analysis the following guidelines for the high-rate conversationalist can be singled out from his works: 1 remember people’s names; 2 be a good listener; 3 become genuinely interested in other people; 4 smile; 5 talk in terms of the other person interests; 6 make the other person feel important.

American linguists, Penelope Brown and Steven Levinson, who are playfully called the pioneers of “politeness theory”, made their own contributions into conversation etiquette as well. In general terms, they established a close intersection between conversation rules and politeness maxims that according to their theory must be merged [2;234-235].

Taking into account all aforesaid assumptions consistently proving the significance of conversation skills, it is rather possible to make some conclusions. Firstly, there is no doubt that the conversation is the basis of civilized society. It can simply be traced that the art of making conversation has been perfected within the development of the society. Regarding the overall society’s headway that kept growing, an ordinary conversation between people could properly reflect the realities of each period in human history. Enhancing the notion, vocabulary was essentially increased by the chain of new words (politesse- sincere good manners, esprit- spirit, galanterie - gallantry, complaisance - obligingness, flatterie – flatter). Secondly, the more modern the manual of conversation, the more concrete its advice is likely to be. To be more distinct, Cicero’s rules of conversation, for example, seem to have been fairly common across cultures as well as time, if verifying in strictness. Newer manuals, on the contrary, will find little to add in terms of fundamental conversation principles. However, they can offer specific hints which are useful only in the right circumstances, and these, too, change little with the years. Thirdly, the aspect of international communication is worth to be considered. It is naturally of importance the conversation which participants belong to various nationalities and whose mother tongues are different to speak to. Do they need to follow some specific conversation rules as well?

In early times of the European Community, when it just began to increase in size, several guidebooks on international etiquette appeared. Those manuals prove that the understanding of the language does not mean a corresponding understanding of traditions and culture of foreign people. A World Guide to Good Manners by Norman Ramshaw includes some typical advice how to express oneself as a professional conversationalist abroad [3;120-148]. In England, for instance, the abstract conversations are prohibited as far as everyone must listen exactly to that one who is speaking and the speaker in his turn has the implementation to be heard out by each member of the company; it is an old tradition in Germany to title the person to whom you are talking to, but in the case it’s unknown you should just address: “Herr Doctor!..”

Concluding it all, the combinability of 2 language norms pertains to conversation in full measure: communicative (primary) and cognitive (secondary). The former is expressed in conversation rules as such and the latter one belongs to the precise comprehension of foreign culture.

          Literature:

1 Hornby A S. Oxford Advanced Lerner’s Dictionary of Current English. Seventh edition. – Oxford University Press, 2005.P.1780.

2 Shepherd Margaret. The Art of Civilized Conversation. – Harvard University Press, 1999.P.450

3 Pinker St. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. N.Y.: Morrow, 1994. P.385