Voronin A.M., Voronin A.A.
Almaty Technological University, Kazakhstan
Munitions
with depleted uranium
From
the 1990s, depleted uranium (DU) became an additional source of environmental
contamination in areas of local military conflicts, such as the Gulf War
(1991), the hostilities in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1994), Serbia (1999), and
finally Iraq (2003).
The
natural mixture of uranium isotopes includes 234U (0.0054%), 235U
(0.72%), and 238U (99.27%). 234U and 238U are members
of the uranium series; in nature they are usually close to the state of secular
equilibrium. 235U is the ancestor of another family of natural
radionuclides, the actinium-uranium series.
It is 235U
that is used to produce nuclear fuel and nuclear weapons. As its concentration
in the natural isotopic mixture is low, one has to enrich uranium with this
isotope, and DU is a waste of this process. DU was a subject of extensive
environmental studies, several scientific conferences as well as numerous
publications in the scientific literature.
DU is
used in military purposes due to the facts that it is a very dense metal
(its density is about 19 g/cm3), it has a high melting point
(1132 °C), great pyrophoricity, and tensile strength that is commensurable
with that of most types of steel. These features make it ideal for use in armour-piercing
ammunition and heavy armour.
DU dust,
formed during the collision with a target, may dissipate and pollute the
environment. On estimate usually 10–35 % (maximum up to 70%) of DU penetrator is
converted into aerosols under a collision or combustion. Most dust particles are
lesser than 5 µm in size, so they are suspended in the air for a long time
and are carried by the wind. DU dust is of black colour and the target, struck
by DU munitions, can often be recognized by the black dusty coating on the
surface and around the target. After firing with munitions of DU, the last settles
down on the ground and other surfaces as uranium oxide dust. According to
researches conducted at the test sites in the U.S., the most part of the
settled DU dust falls within 100 m from the target. However, the DU dust
can also be transported up to 40 km and stay in the air for a considerable
time. Most warheads fallen on soft soil (e.g., sand or clay) penetrate it to a
depth of 50 cm, remaining intact for a relatively long time. An impact of
DU warhead with soft targets, such as soil or non-armoured vehicles, does not cause
significant dust pollution. Weathering of DU warheads depends essentially
on the chemical properties of soils and rocks. In quartz sand, granite, or
acidic volcanic rocks dissolution rate may be high enough to cause local
contamination of groundwater. Wind and water redistribute fine DU dust.
Adsorption on soil particles, mainly clay and organic matter, can alter DU
mobility and reduce the risk of re-suspension. The main potential hazard to the
environment from intact warheads or their large fragments consists in possible
contamination of groundwater after weathering.
A use
of DU in civilian purposes is mostly limited by production of stabilizers for
aircrafts and vessels [1].
It is
estimated that by now there are accumulated about 600,000 tons of DU in the
U.S. alone. About 320 tons of DU were dispersed in the environment during the
Gulf War in the early 1990s, and about 15 tons of DU were used in the Balkans a
few years later.
It is
believed that, contrary to public belief, a major health hazard is not associated
with the radioactivity of DU, but, like other heavy metals, with its chemical
toxicity (mainly affecting kidneys). However, the DU, resulting from the
reprocessing of irradiated nuclear fuel used in nuclear reactors, contains a
wide range of transuranium radionuclides (Table 1), which increases its
radiation hazard.
Table 1
Components
of 1 g of DU in the anti-tank munitions
made by the Starmet Corp., U.K. [2]
|
Nuclide |
Half-life, years |
Mass, g |
Specific activity, Bq/g |
|
Uranium-238 |
4.51·109 |
0.9979 |
12,448 |
|
Uranium-235 |
7.1·108 |
1.2·10–3 |
159.6 |
|
Uranium-234 |
2.47·105 |
1·10–5 |
2,310 |
|
Uranium-236 |
2.39·107 |
3·10–6 |
7.2 |
|
Neptunium-237 |
2.44·106 |
2.2·10–7 |
5.8 |
|
Plutonium-238 |
8.6·101 |
5.2·10–12 |
3.3 |
|
Plutonium-239 & Plutonium-240 |
2.44·104 6.5·103 |
1.2·10–9 |
6.4 |
|
Americium-243 |
7.95·103 |
1·10–9 |
7.4 |
|
Americium-241 |
5.58·102 |
1.7·10–11 |
2.2 |
Traces
of 236U and 239&240U were found in DU warheads
collected in Kosovo. It was also reported that DU has trace amounts of Am, Np,
and 99Tc [3].
Traces
of 236U (<0,003%) are the result of cross-contamination that occurs
when the same equipment is used for the non-irradiated and irradiated uranium. This
isotope is formed in the capture of neutrons by 235U, and it is accumulated
to high concentrations in the nuclear fuel.
Radioactive components of DU decay
primarily by the emission of alpha-particles, which do not penetrate through
any clothing or the skin. So the radiation hazard from external exposure by DU
is minimal.
The
risk to health can however occur through receipts from food or inhalation of
aerosols or particles that are formed in combustion of DU shells and armour after
an impact or penetration of fragments in the soil or other surfaces. In general
the radionuclides may enter the respiratory tract in various forms such as
gaseous compounds, aerosols, or particles. They all have different physical and
chemical properties and therefore affect the lungs differently. Especial
importance should be attached to the size of radioactive particles. Large ones
(5–30 µm in diameter) are usually deposited in the upper part of the respiratory
tract, whereas small particles (~ 1 µm in diameter) can reach the
lower parts of the respiratory system to settle in the alveoli that leads to a
high local dose of surrounding cells and tissues. Thus the small particles of
DU (less than 2.5 µm) can remain in the lungs for a long time, exposing
the lung tissue to radiation, and even go into circulation systems with
biological half-life of about 1 year [3].
Pollution
of the air and atmospheric precipitation can be estimated either by direct
sampling of suspended particles with air filters or by using suitable biological
indicators. The former approach provides a quantitative evaluation and
information on the transport of pollutants. The latter one provides an
inexpensive and reliable means of evaluation of air quality as well as information
on the pollution levels in the past [3].
In the summer
of 1999, Kerekes et al. [4] applied an air sampler, placed in the southern part
of Hungary, to estimate the amount of DU in the air. Isotopic ratios showed
values very close to those expected for natural uranium. However,
they found slightly higher concentration of 238U in particles
smaller than 2.5 µm, that is connected with scattering of DU dust during
the war in Kosovo.
Lichens
and mosses are considered to be suitable biological indicators of atmospheric
deposition of trace elements. As they get most of their nutrients directly from
the atmosphere, they are used for the evaluation and monitoring of air quality
in many countries.
Morphology
of lichens is not subject to seasonal variations, they usually live long, and
accumulation of pollutants lasts years. Due to the absence of roots lichens
have no access to the soil nutrients and, consequently, they are capable to
accumulate various elements, including uranium, mainly by absorbing suspended
particles from the air. However, we know only a few works devoted to uranium accumulation
by lichens. It occurs both in wet and dry conditions from airborne particles
and dust, and even small pieces of lichen can contain easy detectable
concentrations of uranium. Recent international field studies of lichens on the
bark of living trees in Kosovo, in areas close to the ‘target area’, determined
the presence of DU, hence it previously presented in the air even where soil
contamination is not detected. This example highlights the usefulness of
lichens as sensitive biological indicators for areas where DU munitions were
used. In localities where there are no lichens, similar results were obtained
in a study of the surface of tree bark.
One of
the sensitive technique for determining the amount of DU, received via the
respiratory tract, is connected with measurement of uranium that is excreted
with the urine. But there could be very large uncertainties in the estimated
income, because there are many assumptions made about the size of aerosol
particles, uranium solubility, and the rate of transfer between different parts
of the body. An important obstacle lies in natural uranium that is contained in
food and water [3].
On
average, a person excretes with the
urine from 0.01 to 0.4 µg of uranium daily (depending on its income with
food). To estimate income of DU, one should measure an isotopic ratio 235U/238U.
For studies of this type it is often used a mass spectrometer with high
resolution that has a detection limit of DU in the urine not less than 0.01 µg
per day.
American
soldiers who were wounded by DU fragments during the Gulf War had DU
concentration in the urine about 100‑fold higher compared with the normal
one even 7 years later [3].
References
1. Assimakopoulos P.A.
– J. Environ. Radiact., 2003, v. 64, p. 87–88.
2. Trueman E.R.,
Black S., Read D. Characterisation of depleted uranium (DU) from an
unfired CHARM-3 penetrator. – Sci. Total Environ., 2004, v. 327, p. 337–340.
3. Bleise A.,
Danesi P.R., Burkart W. Properties, use and health effects of depleted
uranium (DU): a general overview. – J. Environ. Radiact., 2003, v. 64, p. 93–112.
4. Kerekes A.,
Capote-Cuellar A., Köteles G.J. Did NATO attacks in Yugoslavia
cause a detectable environmental effect in Hungary? – Health Phys., 2001, v.
80, p. 177–178.