Ïåäàãîãè÷åñêèå íàóêè/ 5.Ñîâðåìåííûå ìåòîäû ïðåïîäàâàíèÿ
Master-student G.A.Boszhigitova
Eurasian
National University after L.N.Gumilyov, Astana, Kazakhstan
Lesson
planning guidelines for development of pedagogical content knowledge
Lesson
planning for student teachers is often regarded in technical terms, merely as
the means to ensure effective classroom performance. This approach limits the
possibilities that the process of lesson planning offers to the development of
professional competence among student teachers. In particular, student teachers
need to begin to develop their pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), the
capacity to make pedagogical choices that are logically derived from content
and contextual knowledge. Knowledge
of how to plan lessons is often regarded as technical or instrumental
knowledge. This is illustrated by various international and South African texts
written to support student teachers as they ‘learn to teach’. The reasons given
for lesson planning mostly focus on the role that planning plays in enabling
student teachers to cope ably with the immediate demands of the lesson itself
(their improved confidence in knowing what they need to do during the lesson)
and in enhancing their ability to cope with the unexpected .Student teachers
are warned that failure to plan thoroughly results in aimless teaching, the
choice of inappropriate teaching strategies, time wasted and classroom management
problems. Further reading on a topic is advised to enable a student teacher to
answer questions from learners “correctly and convincingly”. Similarly,
examples from international literature regard lesson planning as important for
instructional effectiveness, scheduling curriculum content, proving that
teachers are doing their jobs and providing a guide for substitute teachers;
and that lesson plans are important as frameworks for “conceptualizing,
designing and delivering instruction”. The value of lesson planning is hence
seen in terms of subsequent instructional performance, and it is the product of
the action of lesson planning that is emphasized, not the value of the process.
As teacher educators, we reflect critically on this technical approach to lesson
planning, arguing that this is a limiting approach, particularly when applied
to pre-service student teachers. As a result of our inquiry into lesson
planning as it is conceptualized in the literature and instantiated in student
teachers’ work, we are convinced that the practice of lesson planning should
offer more to the development of a professional knowledge base for teaching
than merely enabling student teachers to hold their own in a classroom.
Key findings and
Principles of PCK
How PCK is Developed
At
the heart effective content teaching is the teachers' pedagogical content
knowledge. If we are to improve the quality of teaching and learning in
critical core content areas, we need to resist some old traditions in
professional learning. Instead, we should acknowledge and expand the insights of experts who develop
competence in subject matter teaching. We should additionally commit to high
quality professional development targeted to develop this expertise. When we do
this, we support the growth of the teacher as a person and a professional who
can expertly lead a student to academic success. Currently, we will contribute
to the realization of the goals and priorities of the classroom and the school
system as a whole.
REFERENCES
1. Kemmis, S. and T. Smith. 2008.
Personal praxis. In Kemmis, S. and Smith, T. (Eds), Enabling praxis: challenges
for education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers:15–35.
2. Linne, A. 2001. The lesson as a
pedagogic text: a case study of pedagogic designs. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 33 (2):129–156.
3. Killen, R. 2010. Teaching
strategies for quality teaching and learning. Cape Town: Juta.
4. Shalaway, L. 1997. Learning to
teach…not just for beginners. New York: Scholastic.
5. Criticos, C., L. Long, R.
Moletsane, N. Mthiyane and T. Mays. 2009. Getting practical: about
classroombased teaching for the National Curriculum Statement (2nd ed.). Cape
Town, South Africa: Oxford University Press (SAIDE).
6. Ozogul, G. and H. Sullivan. 2009.
Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self
and peer evaluators. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 393–
410.
7. Villarreal, A. “Ten Principles
that Guide the Development of an Effective Educational Plan for English
Language Learners at the Secondary Level – Part II,” IDRA Newsletter (San
Antonio , Texas : Intercultural Development Research Association, February
2009).