Tatarinova L.F.,
Ph.D., professor of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences
The Republic of Kazakhstan, Almaty

Problems selecting the vector of development and regulation of the capital markets of the Eurasian Economic Union in the transformation of the world order and geopolitical conditions

 

Abstract: The world practice has accumulated considerable baggage mechanisms, tools, methods of construction of integration associations. This is very important to study both the theoretical issues of development stages of integration, the factors influencing this process, and analysis of the practice of formation of integration ties in the CIS.

Keywords: integration, economic space, the union, the economy, the capital.

 

Changes in the geopolitical situation affecting the conditions of functioning and development of their economies - and EAEU members, including national capital markets, member countries (Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia).

Starting in 2014 for their subjects (primarily Russian) increases the cost of borrowing on the external and domestic credit markets, there is an outflow of resources is not only speculative, but portfolio investors, investment sources are reduced. States - members of the EAEU, of ​​course, must take into account changes in the global trends of financial market regulation and to implement appropriate initiatives to them at their regional level. But above all, it is necessary to implement the strategic choice of the Eurasian vector of development of the economy in the framework of the existing model of the global economy. Attempts to form a geolocation using traditional lament of the Third World to the injustice the existing order of things, can only support the trend in conservation status of countries - suppliers of raw materials and human capital to developed countries. It is much wiser to try to lift the "resource curse" is not through political spell of his identity and a special way, and consciously pursued policy of transformation of economies within the EAEU of resource extraction in innovative or rather a mixed economy, resource-innovative type.

The main problems of development of innovative activity in the EAEU related to the lack of effective mechanisms for implementation of the priorities of innovation policy, the lack of financial resources needed for the implementation of technological modernization of production, and forward-looking research and development. Requires development and implementation of measures to provide state support and stimulation of innovation, on the development of forms of integration and cooperation related to the organization of 13 high-tech competitive industries, they provide the necessary expertise [1].

At the heart of the well-known inhibition of innovation processes in the EAEU is a lack of financial investment resources, lack of investment capital and a weak investment activity in the field of entrepreneurship. That, in turn, is a consequence of the administrative burden on small and medium businesses, increase (or maintain) the dominant role of state-owned corporations and companies with state participation in the economy.

These problems of the innovation process can be eliminated by appropriate adjustments of public policies and a positive regulatory effect on business by creating comfortable for her political and legal environment. One of the reasons for the current state of affairs is that the current in the states - members of the EAEU financial infrastructure does not include effective mechanisms to raise capital in innovative projects. In order for the productive forces in the leading economies of EAEU (Russia and Kazakhstan) began to develop at the expense of innovation, rather than the extractive industries, it is necessary to create the conditions necessary for the growth of the capacity of the financial markets [2, s.12-13].

The processes of globalization and capital market development are closely linked. Changing the duration of economic cycles and forms of manifestation of the economic crisis is closely linked to the increase in capital market influence on the world economy. The dependence of the post-industrial economies of the capital market is higher than in industrialized or developing. The first will come in the crisis, but will come out of it, due to the fact that capital markets provide fast overflow of resources from the stagnating economy growing segments. The role of capital markets in the national economies of states - members of the EAEU does not allow them yet to confront the growing manifestations of stagnation or slow growth [3, s.14].

The situation can change due to agreed policy of government bodies and international cooperation EAEU, including through the implementation of joint integration projects, such as the formation of a single exchange area.
EAEC should become much more profound form of economic integration than previous attempts at such in the post-Soviet space, and includes, in addition to the Customs Union, such components of sustainable economic growth, as the introduction of a coordinated economic policy, to ensure the free movement of services, capital, labor and access infrastructure of states - members of the EAEU.

Within the framework of the EAEU should operate the same type of regulation mechanisms of the economy based on market principles, harmonization and unification of rules and regulations. To create a corridor of institutional capacity of attracting investment in the economy is necessary to ensure consistency mechanisms maintain competition and state investments, harmonization of tax, monetary - credit policy and currency regulation, create conditions for the development of the EAEU in an integrated capital market.

It is believed that the implementation of the EAEU attempts than the standard models form of interaction between the participants. The actual dominance relationships on the basis of the country's financial center - a country of the periphery of the alleged financial integration weights received format in EU countries. For this format in late 2013 he was invited to Ukraine, which was considered "underdeveloped" country, with all the limitations of self-development of the economy [4, c.12].

On the other hand, it is obvious that Armenia, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan cannot claim to be an important financial centers due to objective size of its economy and capital markets, but that does not mean that they cannot be involved in their creation in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan and take advantage of free access to their services, primarily through participation in the formation of a single exchange area states - members of the Eurasian economic Union.

For example, the noteworthy proposals for the establishment in Armenia, Belarus and Kyrgyzstan interconnected marketplaces for trade in agricultural products. Eurasian integration project in its conception is a long-term and based on the principles of political equality of its members, regardless of the size of their economies for the implementation of which requires adequate financial, organizational - economic, intellectual and human resources.

However, intensification of geopolitical risks reduces the dynamics of development of integration processes in the states - members of the EAEC, due to the weakening of foreign policy positions of key actors - Russia.

As you know, to Russia at the G - 7 and the EU decided to impose sanctions aimed at reducing its economic in, respectively, the political influence on international relations. It is hoped that a gradual but consistent sanctions against key economic entities of the Russian Federation as a result of the annexation of Crimea, of course, reduce the resource base of the EAEC, but will not change the direction of development of this process.

On the contrary, the issue of Eurasian integration is of particular priority in the face of increasing global challenges and the uncertainty of their consequences. The sharp reduction or even withdrawal of foreign investment from Russia should try to compensate for other factors that increase the efficiency of its economy, as a bar EAEU. For example, openness to capital flows from countries - participants of the EAEU, human resources, intangible assets; stimulating tax and customs policy; immigration law; simplified procedure of registration of enterprises, registration of transactions, compliance with modern international standards of accounting, financial reporting, regulation and supervision of the capital market.
In the difficult political and economic circumstances, which were Russia and its partners in the EAEU, as a result of the events taking place in Ukraine, and around policy enforcement, regulatory capital market in the states - members of the EAEU, should largely be based around the idea of ​​integration and the use of domestic sources of growth, as this is one of the little that bilateral relations level EAEU can be contrasted with the unfavorable geopolitical environment.
Thus, we can say that in the difficult political and economic circumstances, which were Russia and its partners in the EAEU, as a result of the events taking place in Ukraine and Syria and around it, the policy bodies regulating the capital market in the states - members of the EAEU, must largely be built around the idea of ​​integration and the use of domestic sources of growth, as this is one of the little that bilateral relations level EAEU can be contrasted with the unfavorable geopolitical environment.

In this regard, the conclusion that, given the existing objective criteria for integration, it would be natural for the states - members of the EAEU to carry out development of capital markets through their inclusion and integration through their development.

The practical implementation of the ideology of the integration of the capital markets EAEU proposed to simultaneously in three key aspects:

- The gradual elimination of the existing restrictions on cross-border capital flows and access of non-residents from other countries of the Union to the internal market for financial services;

- The adoption of common standards of regulation of professional activity in the capital market and corporate governance with the transition in the future to the harmonization of legislation;

- Formation of EBP on the basis of agreed technology and business - processes regulated markets (primarily in the field of clearing and settlement of transactions in financial instruments of issuers of states - members of the EAEU) as a project around which may Eurasian system of financial centers.
Accordingly, the successful integration of the capital markets will contribute to the innovative development of the economies of all states - members of the EAEC.

 

List of references:

1. Belova G.I. Financial integration as an incentive to innovative development of the Eurasian Economic Community // Expert Network in Public Administration / http://www.gosbook.ru/node/77133

2. "Creating a single exchange area and the centralization of institutions, accounting and settlement in the framework of the Common Economic Space" Report on research work. - M., 2015. - 148 p.

3. Lanskov P.M. Domestic investment in financial instruments of capital markets EEA / P.M. Lansky, N.V. Maksimchuk, G.G. Duisenova // Analytical Review / Eurasian Development Bank. - 2015.

4. Ragovik L.V. Factors and limit the development of the Eurasian integration processes in the context of increasing risks of financial globalization // Abstract of the thesis for the degree of candidate of economic sciences. - RSTU 2014.