S. A. Syurin, MD, DrMedSci.  

Kola Research Laboratory for Occupational Health, Kirovsk, Russia

 

Whole-body and hand-arm vibration-related health disorders in High North miners

 

 Introduction.  In many occupations workers are exposed to vibration of different types and parameters not encountered by man prior to the industrialization of human society. In the modern Russian industry vibration-related disorders (VRD) of vascular, neurological and musculoskeletal systems represent one of the most common occupational health problems including temporary and permanent disability [1].

The aim of the study was to investigate the characteristic features of VRD in  the Russian High North miners exposed to whole-body vibration (WBV) or hand-arm vibration (HAV) and cold workplace environment.

Material and methods. The study included 667 VRD cases which diagnostics was based on physical, functional and x-ray examination of patients. According to the Russian vibration safety standard [2], exposure to workplace WBV and HAV was measured by indices of vibration velocity (m/s) and vibration load (dB). In addition, noise level (dBA), air temperature (0С), relative humidity (%) and velocity (m/s) were measured for more complete characterization of workplace environment. Student's        t-criterion and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were applied for statistical analysis of the collected data.

Results. It was found that in Murmansk region (Russian European High North) VRD were diagnosed in 20.1% of all patients suffering from occupational health problems. The vast majority of diagnosed cases of VRD (81.7%) were observed in workers of the mining industry. In the structure of occupational diseases, VRD ranked third being inferior only to chronic respiratory diseases and neurosensory impairment of hearing. The prevalence of VRD caused by mainly HAV was 1.84 times higher  than that  due to mainly WBV: 432 and 235 patients, respectively. In the first group, operators of various load-haul-dump vehicles and drilling rigs formed the majority of patients. Drill operators, tunnelers and mine-face workers dominated in the latter group.

       The early adverse health effects (stage 1 of the Russian classification for VRD) caused by WBV manifested themselves in angiodystonic syndrome and sensori-vegetative polyneuropathy of the lower extremities. In the stage 1-2, there were additional more advanced health disorders:  polyradiculoneuropathy, secondary lumbar-sacral radicular syndrome due to osteochondrosis of vertebral column, cerebral angiodystonic syndrome. Severe health disorders (belonging to the stage 3) did not develop in the workers who were under regular medical surveillance. VRD caused by WBV were diagnosed first at the mean age 49.9±0,5 yrs (29-70 yrs) and the mean duration of employment  24.4±0.7 yrs (5-44 yrs). The distribution of VRD according to severity of clinical symptoms and functional disorders was the following: stage 1 – 71 (30.2%), stage 1-2 - 79 (33.6%) and stage 2 - 85 (36.2%) workers. There was a correlation between severity of VRD and the patients´ age (r=+0.29, p<0.01) and duration of employment (r=+0.30, p<0.01).

       Exposure to HAV led to the development of angiodystonic syndrome and sensori-vegetative polyneuropathy of the upper extremities, degenerative changes of the locomotorium of the upper part of body, cervicobrachial plexopathy. VRD due to HAV were found first at the age 42.7±0.4 yrs (25-59 yrs) and duration of employment  16.6±0.3 yrs (4 – 36 yrs). So their development took place at a significantly earlier age  (p<0.001) and after shorter duration of employment  (p<0.001) as compared to exposure to WBV. The staging of VRD due to HTV was similar to that caused by WBV: stage 1 – 151 (35.0%), stage 1-2 - 133 (34.0%) and stage 2 - 148 (34.3%) workers. Severity of pathological changes induced by HTV correlated with patients´ age (r=+0.28, p<0.01) and duration of work (r=+0.32, p<0.01).

        The operators of hand-held vibratory tools used in Russian mining industry may be exposed to vibration levels significantly higher than excepted limit values (LV): vibration velocity may reach 2.30 m/s (LV 2.00 m/s) and vibration load – 145 dB (LV 126 dB). As a rule, operators of various vehicles and machines were exposed to WBV with action levels within excepted LV. Vibration velocity did not exceed 0.45 m/s (LV 0.28-0.56 m/s) and vibration load – 95 dB (LV 109-115 dB). In addition, operators of hand-held vibratory tools were exposed to contributing occupational hazardous factors such as higher noise levels and worse protection against workplace cold. For operators of hand-held vibratory tools maximum noise levels reached 113 dBA (LV 80 dBA). The cold workplace environment was due to low air temperature (4-100 С), high air relative humidity (86-100%) and flow of cold air caused by natural and artificial ventilation in the mines (up to 1.2 m/s).

       Analysis of the obtained data suggests the following explanation of the earlier and more frequent development of VRD in operators of hand-held vibratory tools: 1) higher intensity of HAV as compared to WBV; 2) additive effect of cold-related and noise-related disorders of vascular, neurological and musculoskeletal systems; 3) possible higher susceptibility to vibration and cold of upper extremities and upper part of the human body.

 Conclusion. Health problems arising from whole-body and hand-arm vibration are highly prevalent among industrial workers in the Russian High North. HAV causes earlier and more frequent occurrence of health disorders as compared to WBV. To reduce or eliminate adverse effects of vibration on exposed workers there is a need for improvement of technical characteristics of hand-held vibratory tools and various load-haul-dump vehicles in combination with strict observance of occupational safety rules. On the other hand, current situation requires the implementation of more efficient medical methods of prevention and treatment of the cited above VRD.

References

1. Artamonova V.G., Mukhin N.A. Occupational Diseases. Moscow: Meditsina Publishing House. 2006: 125-153 (in Russian).

2. System of Labor Safety Standards. Vibration Safety. General Requirements. State Standard 12.1012-90. Moscow. 1990: 1-44 (in Russian).