Currently, in many countries undergoing reforms of public education. This process faces many challenges, problems approach to reform. The first problem is that the children are trying to prepare for the future of the old methods, which pushes many children who will no longer see the point of walking to class. Children explained earlier, that if you do well in school, go to college, get a degree and be sure to find a decent job. But our children do not believe it: with a degree, of course, is better than without it, but it does not give any guarantees. Reformers believe that the way out of the situation may be improving educational standards. The problem is that the current system of education was created and be translated to a different era, an era of cultural education and the economic conditions of the Industrial Revolution.

Until the mid-18th century, a national education system simply does not exist. Importantly, education was received by children from rich families and influential classes. Then it was thought that the mind consists of the ability to identify the type of deductive thinking and knowledge of the classics in the original - it is now calling the academic abilities. At the moment, based on the state of education is the division of people into two types, intellectuals and non-intellectuals. In fact, we have that many potential geniuses do not even have a clue about their talents, because their abilities are evaluated on a very one-sided definition of the criteria of reason.

As everyone knows, the education system rests on two "elephants": economic and intellectual. Nowadays, a lot of the children affected by the sources of information and more external stimuli than ever before in human history. With each of the sources of information as trying to master their attention, whether it be computer games, cell phones, television advertising or hundreds of television shows. But this information it seems much more interesting than what is taught in school. Another fundamental problem is that the current education system operates on a system of industry: schools still resemble plants (calls, breaks, individual housing, specializing in individual subjects). Children are still trained in groups of 10 to 20 people, divided into age groups. Some children are given some things easier than others, and it is easier to learn at a certain time of day. Practice has shown that children learn better in small groups than in large ones. In reforming the education system need to move away from thinking in terms of industry, because at the moment of trying to put in a single framework increasingly standardizing testing methods.

It is not so long ago was published a study on divergent thinking (not to be confused with the creative). Creativity - is the process of creating some of the original ideas that have value. A divergent thinking - it is rather the conditions for creativity. It has been proven that creativity and divergent thinking with age fades... [1] We came to the conclusion that it is necessary to stop: we must first change the point of view of the human mind, it is necessary to stop dividing people into capable and incapable, but to give the start and maintain is personal, individual characteristics of the person. It's time to end the divide objects into abstract, theoretical and professional. It is also necessary to recognize the truth of teaching children in groups, but not big on structure. First, it promotes cooperation and communication skills, and second, a small number of students in this group will result in better learning and mastering of a material, as one teacher is not 10, and not 20, and 5-6, respectively for each student will be given more time in education.

Not to be unfounded, take for example our medical university. On the fifth year of study there is a system for the distribution of subordinators. There is no dispute that subordinatura necessary and important, as it allows her more deeply into sections of the "branches" of medicine. But the distribution system is not ideal. It is here that there is no logical differentiation among students. For example, there is a group of anesthesiology and intensive care, which recruits students with high scores overall performance, with outstanding points for examination in anaesthesiology and intensive care, there is added points scored for publications, research papers and articles. What is the purpose of Medical University in Belarus? And the next aim, which, by the way, in other countries the same: release of highly qualified specialists particular area of medicine. Then the question arises: so what's the problem? And the problem is this: a group of the same anesthesiologists and intensive care specialists recruited people without explicit approach to personality. A student may not have a high GPA, not to participate in the active life of the university, but at the same time, it may just be a fan of anesthesiology and resuscitation as practical and theoretical science: to go on duty as an assistant doctor in his spare time to study questions of items regarding future profession, follow the latest news, articles, publications, research conducted in the field. It can be said that such a student will be proficient in the theoretical and practical skills. But! Such a person has the potential to not get into a group subordinators anesthesiology and intensive care for one simple reason: there are those who have a higher average score. Average ... That does not figure human knowledge in a certain field. Where is the guarantee that the person with the highest average score will be better than the anesthesiologist, who is an ardent fan of the knowledge and practice? No guarantees, we would even say that they do not exist at all ... And now remember, what is the main role of the medical university?

Summarizing, we need to remember that only the individual approach in education is the best way of both the individual and the nation as a whole.

Used literature:

1. G. Land & B. Jarman “Breakpoint and Beyond – mastering the future today”