E.E. Ibraev, Kostanai
State University, Department of History of Kazakhstan
THE LEGACY OF THE
BRITISH EMPIRE
The
British empire with colonies on all continents was the largest in the history of mankind. By the 30th year of the
twentieth century, the total area of all British land was 37
million sq. M. km. In the empire lived approximately
500 million. People (about a
quarter of the world's population). The
British Empire at the height of producing
25% of world GDP. Empire lasted more than four years (1497 - 1997) before
the handover of Hong Kong under
the sovereignty of China.
Scattered colonies around the world and
extensive communication disperse material and human resources of the metropolis. And while London to restore order in the overseas colonies in Europe has changed the
balance of power. Kaiser's Germany defied the British lion.
Although Germany had lost the struggle for redivision of the world
and world domination, Britain ceded the leadership of the American eagle.
In the book, the English historian,
professor at Oxford University Niall Ferguson (b.
1964), "Empire. The rise and fall
of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global
Power "(2003) compares the
former power Britain with modern American power. Scientists call the British Empire first superpower in the
true sense of the word.
British Empire collapsed under the weight
of the two world wars, becoming the
largest creditor of the debtor. Great British
emigration, paves the way for imperial expansion, has given way to immigration to Britain. Ugas missionary impulse
of Christianity, preached the great commandments and circumcision. Empire is
dead, but her legacy has had a
tremendous impact on the modern
world.
Without
the expansion of
Britain liberal capitalist model
and parliamentary democracy could not have successfully strengthened in many countries with different socio-economic systems. Alternative authoritarian economic model to adopt the Russian and Chinese
empires, brought upon their people untold hardships. The world's largest Indian democracy owes its formation to
the British. English has become an
important export, and for the
last three hundred years, the
number of English speakers increased
to 800 million. People. Without
denying the "shameful page" in the history of the British
Empire (slavery and ethnic
cleansing), Ferguson says the
spread of free trade, capital and free labor. Britain has been extended to the Overseas Territories
and the rule of law has invested huge funds in the development of global
communications. Britain was the guarantor of global peace, in spite of numerous small wars. Without the British Empire would not have been large-scale trade liberalization and significant labor migration. The total outflow from England to
the colonies was 20 million.
People. More than a century prior to the War of Independence,
Britain ruled the core of the future United States. Quality of life in British North America
minimally different from the metropolis.
British
Empire encouraged the
export of capital to less developed countries. In the early twentieth century, 63% of FDI going to developing countries,
while at the end of the century only 28%. Development of the colonized territories contributed to the British legal institutions and administration.
Modern research has shown that in law the most protected
investors in countries
with a common-law British than in states that
have adopted the French system of
civil law. The British administration
was highly efficient and surprisingly incorruptible. Especially when compared to decolonize and the
Newly Independent States, where the observed correlation between economic backwardness and criminal corrupt government. Ferguson concludes that the experiment
of running the world without the Empire cannot be considered successful. Economic globalization has clearly contributed to economic growth
with uneven distribution of its
fruits. But political instability and civil war have played a major role in the devastation of the poorest states.
The
most logical way to confront
chaos is colonization. The need for "defensive" ("Enlightenment") colonialism
is very significant, but there is no
state that can fulfill the role of the British Empire past. American, now ruling
the empire, and the strengths and
weaknesses of the last of the
British power. With undisputed economic and military and political power, she lacks the
human energy to export their capital, people and culture around the world. America is not willing to sacrifice their own material well-being for the sake of the whole world.
Arguing
with Fergyusenom, Russian
philosopher Boris Mezhuev observes that Empire enforcers
democratic system - a logical absurdity. Democracy
implies dependence on state power will of the citizens, while
the meaning of the empire is to subordinate authorities
external force. The British Empire has successfully exported its capital, good governance, integrity and British culture
around the world. But the British lion fell from
the extinction of the human
energy and the missionary impulse of Christianity, as well as under the burden of two world wars. As a result of the imperial heritage in many countries
to strengthen the parliamentary model
of democracy and British law,
the liberalization of world trade,
and the English language continues to
conquer the world.
Deserves respect and geopolitical transformation of the British Empire in the Commonwealth of Independent States. If we
translate in abbreviation,
it turns the CIS. But not with feet of clay, or live, or dead, and the present. The Commonwealth
has 53 member states. Head of the Commonwealth - the Queen of England Elizabeth II. The total population of 1.8 billion. People or 30% of the population. Modern Britain remains
attractive to many Commonwealth countries, and Russia in the CIS continues to scare near abroad devastating
tsunami mindless democracy,
created a danger stratification in
society.
Among the great statesmen of the UK often referred
to King Henry VIII, his daughter Queen Elizabeth, Queen
Victoria, her husband and cousin - Prince Albert, who
died at 41 years old. King of
England and Ireland, Henry VIII (1491 - 1547) thanks to the cinema gained fame as a polygamist, the execution of several of their wives and friends. However, in between endless
marriage and divorce
drama king united
the country, abolished the papal jurisdiction
of the Roman Catholic Church of
England, became the founder of the British naval power.
Queen
Victoria (1819 - 1901), who had nine children, the rules for more than 60
years. The Victorian era laid the foundation for a "democratic
monarchy". Of the politicians
of the twentieth century, the primacy belongs to
Prime Minister Sir Winston
Spencer Churchill, who became, among other things, the
Nobel Prize in Literature. Among the
commanders preferred to Admiral Nelson, smashed the French fleet at the
Battle of Trafalgar and the "Iron Duke"
Wellington who defeated Napoleon at Waterloo itself.
In the UK, created numerous historical films "The Tudors," "Henry VIII», «Victoria
and Albert," "The
Duchess" and others, raising respect
for the past fatherland.
Today is curious to
observe the outgoing British
aristocracy earn through tourism and other handouts for the content of their castles. Some family
castle owners keep their own
tours. Tourists are
admitted to the castles in the
morning until the evening. You
can order a party or a wedding
in the banquet hall, where the table once sat someone
crowned royals. But
in many cases, ticket and other
charges is not enough to overhaul
to restore the castle.
Probably, the same would have suffered, and to
take into account the Russian aristocracy
- from graphs to
princes, if not for the proletarian revolution, has interrupted
this natural evolutionary process of changing classes. As, paradoxically, in
the Soviet Union of the victorious proletariat, destroyed the aristocracy as a class, many estates masterpieces of architecture or culture
managed to maintain due to their transition to public ownership.
In
all spheres of social and political
life and life "Albion"
is manifested eternal rivalry of English and French. Naturally, the most prominent British commanders those
who broke the French. If conditionally to
rank the core values of the
British and French, they line up in the witness order. The
English democracy, Hyde Park, horse
and women. The French: wine, women and democracy.
In England, as
we know, live ladies and
gentlemen, and in France - Monsieur
and Madame. English gentlemen love horses more than women. At least, it can be judged by the abundance of paintings by local artists depicting horses more
often than women. Maybe because women have to say about all the men what they
think and gentlemen it is not always like that. What a difference a horse. Famously said, "Oatmeal,
sir!" Said that oats is not only the main crops "Albion", but also a staple food,
as for the English, and for their horses. French
men, on the contrary, more like not
cloven-hoofed animals, and women,
especially the courtesans.
French jealously indifferent to the British, accusing them of lack of national cuisine. The French - the cult of wine, and the British -
the cult of tea. English life exclusively adapted
for human benefit. Probably, having stayed world empire, train and make war on the world,
the British began to appreciate more
comfort at home.
SOURCES
1. Scammel J. The Oxford History of
British Empire. New Haven; L.: Yale University press, Oxford University press,
2009. - 23 p.
2. Соколов А. Колониальная
политика Великобритании в освещении новейшей зарубежной историографии '/
Внешняя и колониальная политика Великобритании в XVIII-XX
вв. Ярославль, 1993. С 41
3. Rajat Kanta Ray, "Indian Society and the Establishment of British
Supremacy, 1765-1818," in The Oxford History of the British Empire: vol.
2, The Eighteenth Century" ed. by P. J. Marshall, (1998), pp. 508-29
4. Ливен, Доминик. «Российская
империя
и
ее
враги. С XVI века
до
наших
дней». М. «Европа», - 2007, с. 688, с. 173
5. Marshall, P.J. 1783-1870: An Expanding Empire // The Cambridge
Illustrated History of the British Empire / ed. by P.J. Marshall / P.J.
Marshall. - Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 1999. - P.24 - 51.